THE PHARMACOLOGICAL APPROACH TO TREATING
CHILDHOOD PSYCHOSES: THEORETICAL BASIS

Renato COCCHI. A neurologist and a medical psychologist


(Italian translation) // Testo in italiano

 

Summary

Drug treatment of childhood psychoses is founded on the ever growing evidence of a primitive biological disturbance, and on the need to recognize the human organism's inseparable bio-psychic unit. The American idea, which postulated a single biological error to be corrected by just one drug, we feel as impracticable for now and our own approach, which we have been operating for at least eight years (documented in the videotapes) is based on the following premises:

a. Like any other illness, infantile psychoses present symptoms of endogenous stress. They come from the illness itself (not to mention the secondary psychological stress too), symptoms that we can treat through drugs;

b. The symptoms, signs of dysfunction in one or more neurochemical pathways, can be rectified working backwards by drugs. In this way we can reduce the presumed general neurochemical imbalance and the current symptoms of the illness itself.

In this approach the use of physiological substances occupies prime position, while we can avoid the use of neuroleptics until preadolescence. This type of therapy is perfectly compatible with any other kind of intervention (psychological, in its broad meaning) which is then eased. Various cases treated in this way were presented, with all their specific indications, in the videotape section at the Urbino Conference.

Key words: Childhood psychoses; drug therapy; theoretical bases.

Autism

Drug modulation of stress reactions

Mental retardation

Home Page // Pagina iniziale


The theoretical bases of the drug treatments that I have used in cases of infantile psychoses since 1981 are not simple. Nevertheless, I believe they have their own clear line.

First I feel the need to outline a series of premises that I believe to be indispensable in understanding both my work and that of other professionals. Even though not using pharmacological methods, these latter persons still maintain they obtain appreciable results.

Excluding behavioural therapy, which I consider to be a quite different technique, there can only be two answers: either some of us are not interpreting their own work properly or we are all telling the truth, even if it is only a partial truth.

Until proven wrong I sustain the second hypothesis.

I must say straight away however, that when bad breasts, empty fortresses and fish-children become like faith objects. They went beyond the boundaries of science, as objects verifiable in experimental conditions, or at least foreseeable with a large statistic approximation. It is one thing to describe a type of behaviour, but its interpretation is quite another.

The latter, expressed in metaphorical terms, gets to impose an ideological straight jacket on the parents. The risks are many, ranging from a useless guilt attribution to the parents themselves (should that have any sense) to a waste of precious time in curing the child.

Along these lines I am perfectly according to the ideas of Ritvo and Laxer (1983).

I have already said that I do not believe psychological treatment of a psychotic child as therapeutically wrong, but a very incomplete approach.

By the videotaped case of pharmacological therapy started 1982 (Cocchi 1990a) here presented, I should to make clear that what I am doing is not the result of any recent conversion.

For a long time now I maintained that infantile psychoses not only had biological bases, (see Cordella 1989c & 1990 for an outline of the problem). So I believe that a biological approach is one indispensable method to be able to tackle the problem with the largest degree of success.

Despite this, unlike many other colleagues, I have always advised parents to seek other integrative therapies. Very often however, I have had to go into "the catacombs." That is to say I have had to, and still have to, accept that the parents deny that the child is undergoing drug therapy. Only in this way they may obtain permission to profit from other treatments offered by the public health services.

This too, unfortunately, is a characteristic of the drug approach today in Italy. Here the systematic lack of knowledge on the use of psychodrugs does not drive to "we don't know," but rather to the more debatable "we don't want to."

About psychological aspects, in every illness, and in infantile psychoses, there is always a negative psychological element, secondary to the illness itself. The important thing is not to confuse this, which is a secondary phenomena always found, with primary cause.

In terminal illness such a cancer, this psychological aspect is receiving attention and treatment, as it is right and logical. Nobody is under the illusion that it can invert the fatal course of the illness. This is the mistake that ran for years in infantile psychoses and I believe that unfortunately it will go on. As the result of which, 20-years ago autistic children are now autistic adults.

Given that they have not become schizophrenics for example, their treatment is even more difficult. By speaking through my own experience, something can still be done, especially on behaviour.

I therefore come to the end of this part, which is not a mere pouring out of my personal discomfort. It is rather a simple report and warning to those wishing to follow the pharmacological approach in treating infantile psychoses.

I have not yet finished with the premises that are indispensable in understanding my work.

From at least 20 years I think that the brain mechanisms do not function based on a series oæ_ linear cause and effect relationships. A multivariable system seems more fitting, in which the many mechanisms are interconnected, even if there is some form of hierarchy.

And so it follows: 1. That one neurotransmitter will never be the sole cause of complex syndromes such as infantile psychoses; 2. That the therapy could never be based on one drug. This works even for vitamin B6 that enters about 60 different brain metabolism mechanisms. I have been using it for the past 15 years if not more.

The polytherapy that I normally use in child psychoses allows low dosages always, a balance between the various drugs, _synergism, no possibility of habit forming and the possibility, if carried out well, of an interruption without rebound phenomena.

Nevertheless, after a certain length of time from interruption, there is a reversal to the previous state. This proves that the therapy, up to that moment, at least, has been only a replacement therapy.

Unfortunately, many medical practitioners have no clear notion of what "replacement therapy" actually means. So, on interruption of the treatment, they confuse a return to the pre-cure condition with the phenomenon of habit forming which is quite different.

A polytherapy acting on the CNS should have carried out, in my view, with physiological substances as far as possible. That is a way to reduce the much feared but little proven risks of toxicity.

As far as vitamins are concerned, the human brain uses them in different ways depending on the areas (Baker et al., 1984). It is therefore not absurd that a dysfunction in some brain structured such as the Pons and the Midbrain that can be the cause of most cases of squint. So it can be corrected also by administering the two vitamins mostly used in these structures, pyridoxine and biotin.

I have already published my experience in this field, on spontaneous nystagmus (Cocchi & Branchesi, 1989; Cocchi & Maniscalco, 1990) as I will indeed publish my work on convergent squint.

It follows that, apart from the rest of the clinical situation, in the presence of the symptoms "spontaneous nystagmus" or "convergent squint" (often associated), - and if a refractive origin of the squint can be excluded - then these two physiological substances are well indicated.

In other words, a whole series of symptoms can point towards the malfunctioning neurochemical mechanisms. While saying this however, it is not necessarily true that a functional deficiency corresponds with a deficit in the neurotransmitter involved.

With infantile psychoses there is often initial hypersensitivity, particularly regarding sound but also, it seems, the other sensory canals.

Since it is by now well accepted that the sensory canals utilise mainly the glutamate as a neurotransmitter (Fagg, 1985) hypersensitivity of this type must lead us to think not of a deficit, but of an excess of the glutamate.

The results of this magnification will be a sensitive-like stress (as for example when a normal individual finds himself in the presence of a continuous excessive noise). In the condition of acoustic hypersensitivity, even normal sounds reach the pain threshold and produce ulterior stress.

If this should happen through all perceptive canals, there would be a blockage in the passage of these stimuli, which seems typical of infantile psychoses (Ornitz et al., 1985).

The glutamate does not seem to have a limiting step for its synthesis in the CNS, unlike the case of the GAD for GABA (Baxter, 1976). We have to remember that GABA finds the glutamate itself as its most important precursor.

We know that the glutamate largely arrives in the CNS either as a derivative of glutamine or from glucose through the Krebs cycle (Ward, Thanki & Bradford, 1983). So, the only way to limit its production is the reducing of the intake of these two substances, by limiting the introduction of foods which are rich in these respects: Broth for glutamine, sweets for glucose (Cocchi, 1990b) or a general reduction of food intake as a whole.

Here are three more symptoms of great informative value.

As for diet habits, another variable appears: The need for pasta or bread, found often in these children may suggest another attempt at compensation. By now it is certain that cereals, and among them wheat, contain equally two benzodiazepines, diazepam and N-desmethyldiazepam (De Blas, 1988. Then benzodiazepines are moreover natural substances though originally discovered as synthetic products. The question arises about whether it is not the need for these substances that drives the children towards these foods.

Already, with regards auto-aggression, you will have understood that the organism tries to compensate, before falling into a more deficient functional state (Cocchi & Bonaduce, 1988). This is a common physiological fact, even if not largely considered in relation to brain functioning.

Every kind of compensating will work as partial though, otherwise, if it were 100% efficient, we would have no illness.

The most probable risk fought by auto-aggression is cardiac collapse. An increase in adrenergic and noradrenergic peripheral and cortisolic incretion is one way to limit this risk (Cocchi & Bonaduce, 1988).

Difficulty in falling asleep is always a sign of a central serotoninergic deficit (Puizillout et al., 1981). Then some sufferers have a glass of milk at night before retiring, milk being a richest source of triptophane (Geigy Scientific Tables, 1981) the precursor of serotonin.

We need do not forgot though that an increase in corticosteroid incretion can promote the synthesis of serotonin (Rastogi & Singhal, 1978). Banging the head against the headboard or simply swinging or rocking motion could serve to induce sleep.

Another element to consider is the relationship between CNS and the Vegetative NS.

Now it is clearly wrong to call the Vegetative NS as "autonomous," since its activation by the hypothalamus (Goto et al., 1985), especially due to intense and chronic stress. This activation is prevalently vagal, parasympathetic.

A tendency towards sudden diarrhoea, of brief duration and without any specific reason is another symptom of notable value. Here we find the usefulness of understanding all the symptoms, because they give us reference to the central mechanisms.

The knowledge of 40-50 symptoms of this kind can therefore give us information as to the cerebral and cerebellar functioning of the glutamate, GABA, serotonin, noradrenalin, acetylcholine, dopamine, the endogenous opiates, just to mention the most well kown neurotransmitters. It has been demonstrated how under stress all these neurotransmitters can be involved simultaneously, as the effect of an excess of GABA B inhibition (see later on, for references).

I think that the critical point is indeed the stress. From this we can start again to attempt a full comprehension of the reasons for adopting a pharmacotherapy like mine. This could also be useful to understand the possible cause of infantile psychoses.

Corticosteroid incretion from stress, produces a neurotoxic effect on the cortisolic Hippocampus receptors, which reduce its ability to retroactively inhibit corticosteroid incretion. In this way the capacity of the organism to react adequately to subsequent stress already goes down.

Moreover, there comes about an increase first in the hypersensitive effect, and then in the neurotoxic effect of the glutamate, also on the frontal cortex (see for a review: Cordella 1989a and 1989b).

This however is a secondary mechanism, very important for a general understanding, but not yet explicating as to the underlying cause. To understand the latter we should look back at the relationship between stress and GABA.

Under the influence of a stressing agent, type A GABAergic receptors, namely those activated by the benzodiazepines, change their conformation rapidly, by that reducing type A GABAergic inhibition. (Medina et al., 1983). This may be only a temporary event, but if the stress is very intense or lasts a long time this could become a stable condition (Braestrup & Nielsen, 1983; Biggio et al., 1984) which drives to a succession of events such as:

- Lower consumption of GABA by type A receptors, reduced in number;

- Following the relative excess of GABA available, an increase in type _B GABAergic inhibition follows. This inhibits the cerebral activity of serotonin (Ketelaars & Bruinvels, 1988), dopamine (Bovery et al., 1980), noradrenaline (Suzdac & Gianutsos 1985a, 1985b) and acetylcholine (Estevez et al., 1984 Sidel et al., 1988);

- An increase in endogenous opiates and endorphines (Cocchi, 1990d);

- Hypothalamus activation of peripheral parasympathetic stimulation (Goto et al., 1985);

- The peripheral necessity for sympathetic compensation (Cocchi & Bonaduce, 1988; Cocchi, 1990d);

- Reduced synthesis of GABA due to the partial blocking of GAD (Baxter, 1976; Loescher, 1980).

- Following the reduced synthesis of GABA, retroactive increase of _the glutamate in the CNS, with an increase in sensitivity and the risk of neurotoxicity.

This, in brief is what already known.

The stress that most likely sets off this chain of events is of pre-, peri-, neonatal nature (Cordella 1989a, 1989b) not serious enough to cause massive neuronal damage. If something like this in fact happens, then the diagnosis would be infantile cerebral palsy, mental deficiency, and epilepsy).

Evidently, a newborn child starting off life under these conditions can, right from the start, have a lower emotive threshold. So, all the accompanying neurovegetative, psychological, and secondary psychodynamic consequences can follow.

Often this is not the picture right from birth though.

The case of the autistic child is well known however, the child who for the first year and part or all of the second year of life not only shows any sign of the psychosis but develops more quickly autonomous walking and language.

A retrospective investigation would show that, given the ability to evaluate the health status, there were symptoms of neurovegetative and behavioural damage (Negri, 1990) but their importance is limited to risk signals, moreover not yet quantified.

Then the breakpoint and regression came out, with the appearance of quite clearly psychotic symptoms.

Is it possible to interpret this event as linked to stress too? I think yes, if we bear in mind three things:

1. That stress can also have an internal metabolic triggering agent;

2. That the second year of life is a very delicate time in which the functioning of cerebral mechanisms that have reached maturity in this time comes into play. Some brain areas could have subtle damages by the primary cause, without letting it known until this point, what their state of a malfunction is.

3. That the functional imbalance between intact and damaged cerebral areas could itself be the cause of ulterior stress, reaching levels at which the organism is no longer able to control.

In Downs syndrome, the continuous metabolic stress, caused by the presence of the third chromosome 21 and by the consequent dosage effect is much more likely to set off a psychotic onset due to the chronic stimulus and to the (experimentally documented) reduction in the capacity to respond to the stress (Cocchi, 1989).

Given parity of stressing agents, both in Downs and normal children, a psychotic onset does not come about always. The reason is that this also depends on the variability of the individual constitution to deal with stress (Vogel, 1985).

This is a very general introduction to a problem that would require a seminar of at least 30 hours to be exhaustive.

It is hoping however, that the multiviariability of the mechanisms involved will have interested many people. As seen, all the therapies proposed, from vitamin B6, cofactor of the GAD and therefore involved in GABA synthesis, to phenfluramine, naltrexone, diet correction, and psychological intervention of a prevalent anxiolytic nature, can have some effect.

Each of them in fact, can correct the relative malfunctioning neurochemical mechanism. Each will only be ever a partial therapy.

Not only this but the dosage increasing in monotherapy, from drugs to stimulation, can induce exacerbation as the cause of a further neurochemical imbalance from a therapy stress. If this seems far fetched just think of what happens in antibiotic therapy given to already fragile infants, with infantile CP or mental deficiency for example. We should bear in mind that 250,000 units of penicillin are enough to send an adult cat into a convulsion (Van Gelder et al., 1983). The convulsive reaction is now considered as an imbalance between inhibiting neurotransmitters (GABA types) and excitatory ones (such as glutamate) (Meldrum, 1984).

With what criteria then can one start a drug therapy in the psychotic child?

To sum it up:

1. Evaluate the symptoms to figure out the particular neurochemical imbalance in that child;

2. Start correction by restoring the functionality of the type A GABAergic receptor; The best antistress drugs are, as we known, the benzodiazepines, and, among them, the best one is still diazepam.

3. Use low drug dosages in order tï avoid metabolic stress action brought on by the drugs.

4. Use, as far as possible, physiological substances;

5. Do not expect or imply short term resolutions, but work on small and successive progressions; one must think in terms of years of pharmacological therapy (Cocchi, 1990c);

6. Be prepared for moments of stasis or regression, which can always happen and should be interpreted (Cocchi, 1990b). A therapy that was going well, can become suddenly ineffective in controlling an added stress (often of seasonal nature);

7. Do not ignore eventual overstimulating effects, the so called "paradoxical" effects of the drugs used (Cocchi, 1990c);

8. Yet not we do not know all the variables. So, success may be modest or not at all in about 10% of cases, at least in my experience (Cocchi, 1990c);

9. Start the therapy as soon as possible. This is also the only way to hope for a larger impact on the neuronal plasticity, at least of dendritic and synaptic development.

No doubt the video tapes I presented and the two cases described in detail (Cocchi 1990a & 1990b) will have clarified, at least partly, the practical side of this approach. Due to its nature, we can only individually tailor it as stress responses vary from child to child for reasons of genetic and acquired characteristics (Vogel, 1985). Above all they will be variable responses, with a tendency to be less efficacious depending on the age and the duration of the stress.

It is the illness itself, like any illness, the continuous source of stress, even if we would like to see it exclusively from a psychological point of view.

This means unlucky that we cannot ever have therapeutic protocol, a new transitional object for all those people who no longer know how to be clinicians. I hope I will find time to write a book, or to design a computer program that covers all the variables I know and have experimented with. So, not only my experiences can be repeated, but enriched by the findings of others.

References.

Baker H., Frank O., Chen T.: Vitamin content of some normal brain segments. J. Neurosci. Res.1984, 11: 419-435.

Baxter C.F.: Some recent advances on GABA metabolism and compartmentation. In: Roberts E., Chase T.N., Tower D.B. (eds): GABA in nervous system function. Raven Press, New York, 1976: 61-87.

Biggio G., Concas A., Serra M., Corda M.G., Nurchi V., Crisponi C., Gessa G.L.: Stress and beta-carbolines decrease the density of low affinity GABA binding sites: an effect reversed by diazepam. Brain Res. 1984, 305: 13-18.

Bovery N.G., Hill D.R., Hudson A.L.: (-)Baclofen decreases neurotransmitter release in the mammalian CNS by an action on a novel GABA receptor. Nature 1980, 283: 92-94.

Braestrup C., Nielsen M.: Biochemical studies of CNS receptors. 1st Ed. Plenum Press, New York 1983: 285-384.

Cocchi R.: Psychosis in Down children: An epidemiological and clinical survey on 413 subjects. It. J. Intellect. Impair. 1989, 2: 131-136.

Cocchi R.: Aminoacidi plasmatici in una bambina autistica prima e dopo 7 anni di farmacoterapia. Riv. It. Disturbo Intellet. 1990a, 3: 127-130.

Cocchi R.: Precursori diretti dell ac. glutammico e del GABA e abitudini alimentari nei Down: indagine epidemiologica su 460 soggetti. Riv. It. Disturbo Intellet. 1990b, 3: 307-312.

Cocchi R.: Childhood psychoses: results of drug treatments in Down and non Down children. It. J. Intellect. Impair. 1990c, 3: 195-202.

Cocchi R.: Drug therapy in children self-abuse behaviour. ICS 300. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990d.

Cocchi R., Bonaduce D.: L'autoaggressivita` nel bambino psicotico. Riv. It. Disturbo Intellet. 1988, 1: 185-191.

Cocchi R., Branchesi R.: Il nistagmo nel bambino Down: Presenza, implicazioni ed esiti dopo farmacoterapia. Riv. It. Disturbo Intellet. 1989, 2: 213-217.

Cocchi R., Maniscalco M.: Scomparsa del nistagmo spontaneo in 3 bambini cerebropatici trattati con farmaci. Riv. It. Disturbo Intellet. 1990, 3: 331-336.

Cordella L.: Stress, glucocorticoidi e handicap: il danno pre- e perinatale. Riv. It. Disturbo Intellet. 1989a, 2: 75-83.

Cordella L.: Stress, glucocorticoidi e handicap: II. le influenze postnatali Riv. It. Disturbo Intellet. 1989b, 2: 93-101.

Cordella L.: Aspetti elettrofisiologici dell'autismo infantile. Riv. It.. Disturbo Intellet. 1989c, 2: 169-179.

Cordella L.: Autismo infantile: revisione dei reperti neurobiologici. Riv. It.. Disturbo Intellet. 1990, 3: 47-57.

De Blas A.L.: Diazepam and N-desmethyldiazepam in plant food and in brain. Trends NeuroSci. 1988, 11: 489-490.

Estevez E.E., Jerusalinsky D., Medina J.H., De Robertis E.: Cholinergic muscarinic receptors in rat cerebral cortex, basal ganglia and cerebellum undergo rapid and reversible changes after acute stress. Neuroscience, 1984, 13: 1353-1357.

Fagg G.E.: L-glutamate, excitatory amino acid receptors and brain function. Trends NeuroSci 1985, 8: 207-210.

Geigy Scientific Tables. Ciba-Geigy, Basle 1981: 214.

Goto Y., Tache Y., Debas H., Novin D.: Gastric acid and vagus nerve response to GABA agonist baclofen. Life Sci. 1985, 36: 2471-2475.

Ketelaars C.E.J., Bruinvels J.: GABA-B effects on extinction of conflict behavior are possibly related to modulation of the 5-HT system. Paper presented at the XVI CINP Congress, Munich, 1988. Psychopharmacology 1988, 96 (Suppl.): 205.

Loescher W.: Effect of inhibitors of GABA transaminase on the synthesis, binding, uptake and metabolism of GABA. J. Neurochem. 1980, 34: 1603-1608.

Medina J.H., Novas M.L., Wolfman C.L., Levi de Stein M., De Robertis E.: Benzodiazepine receptors in rat cerebral cortex and hippocampus undergo rapid and reversible changeó after acute stress. Neuroscience 1983, 9: 331-335.

Meldrum B.: Amino acid neurotransmitters and new approaches to anticonvulsant drug action. Epilepsia 1984, 25(Suppl. 2): S140-S149.

Negri R.: Elementi psicotici nel lattante. Individuazione e trattamento. Riv. It. Disturbo Intellet. 1990, 3: 265-271.

Ornitz E.M., Atwell C.W., Kaplan A.R., Westlake J.R.: Brain-stem dysfunction in autism. Results of vestibular stimulation. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1985, 42, 1018-1025.

Puizillout J.J., Gaudin-Chazal G., Sayadi A., Vigier D.: Serotoninergic mechanisms and sleep. J. Physiol. (Paris) 1981, 77: 415-424.

Rastogi R.B., Singhal R.L.: Adrenocorticoids control 5-hydroxytryptamine metabolism in rat brain. J. Neural Transmission 1978, 42: 63-71.

Ritvo E.R., Laxer G.: Autisme. La verite' refusee. SIMEP, Villeurbanne-Paris, 1983.

Sidel E.S., Tilson H.A., McLamb R.L., Wilson W.A., Swartzwelder H.S.: Potential interaction between GABA-B and cholinergic system: baclofen augments scopolamine-induced performance deficits in the eight-arm radial maze. Psychopharmacology 1988, 96: 116-120.

Suzdak P.D., Gianutsos G.: Differential coupling of GABA-A and GABA-B receptors in the noradrenergic system. J. Neuronaì Transmission. 1985a, 62: 77-89.

Suzdak P.D., Gianutsos G.: GABA-noradrenergic interaction: Evidence for differential sites of action for GABA-A and GABA-B receptors. J. Neuronal Transmission. 1985b, 62: 163-172.

Van Gelder N.M., Siatiteas I., Menini G., Gloor P.: Feline generalized penicillin epilepsy: Changes of glutamic acid and taurine parallel the progressive increase in excitability of the cortex. Epilepsia 1983, 24: 200-213.

Vogel W.H.: Coping, stress, stressors and health consequences. Neuropsychobiology 1985, 13: 129-135.

Ward H.K., Thanki C.M., Bradford H.F.: Glutamine and glucose aas precursors of transmitter amino acid: Ex vivo studies. J. Neurochem. 1983, 40: 855-860.

Paper presented at the International Congress "Comparing theories and therapies in childhood psychoses", Urbino 8-10 September 1989.

Printed on It. J. Intellect. Impair. 1990, 3: 185-193

 

Author's address: dr Renato COCCHI, via Rabbeno, 3

42100 Reggio Emilia (Italy)

renatococchi@libero.it

 

Italian translation  // Testo in italiano

Autism

Drug modulation of stress reactions

Mental retardation

Home Page // Pagina iniziale