THE DIFFICULTY OR
REFUSAL TO HAVE THE HAIR COMBED IN DOWNS. RESULTS IN 33 SUBJECTS AFTER
ANTISTRESS DRUG THERAPY.
Renato COCCHI, neurologist and medical
psychologist.
Summary
Thirty-three Down subjects who showed the
symptom "difficulty or the refusal to have the hair combed" (14 M and
19 F, all with standard trisomy 21; average age at first consultation 69.70
months, range 11-204) had follow-ups of such a symptom during an antistress
drug therapy. Thirty-one (93.94%) had the disappearance of it after, at
average, 10.97 months of treatment. It is confirmed the female prevalence, and
ex [adjuvantibus], the relationship of the symptom with the stress.
Key words: Down syndrome,hair
combing,difficulty,refusal,stress,antistress drug therapy.
Modulation of stress reactions by drugs.
Down syndrome
Home Page / / / Pagina iniziale
In a previous investigation (Cocchi, 2003)
it was noting the prevalence, in Downs, of a curious symptom, the difficulty or
the refusal to have his/her hair combed, mainly the hairs of the nape.
The child involves as if to having the hairs
combed produced him/her pain. Every mother confirming me the presence of this
symptom, has always considered this one as a specific feature of his/her child,
ignoring that instead it is a frequent fact.
Victor Bishop of the Riverbend Down Syndrome
Support Group, USA, wrote me this personal comment after reading the first
paper of mine on this topic. "I have heard that this is a common problem
with Downs going to the barber shop and having a haircut."
Then this me conscious that this symptom is
not only a pure curiosity, but that it creates bothers in the usual management
of the Down child.
The difficulty or the refusal to have the
hair combed does not appear to get ever systematic investigations (Check on
Medline 1960-2003) but it was reported anecdotally in two autistic Down
children, as I find on Google.
The previous epidemiological investigation
on 213 subjects found its presence in 83 of them. I concluded that this symptom
doesn't have any relationship with the chromosomal diagnosis, it has female
prevalence and disappear with the age.
Already then, however, I wrote
"Unfortunately this symptom, as not essential to evaluate the current
stress and the possible brain biochemical balance, did not have punctual
attention and investigation in all subjects, even if this happened in a random
way."
The same mostly occurred in following its
evolution during a drug therapy, which never had such a symptom as its target.
Materials and methods.
This research has been carried out on the 83
clinical cards where, in the preceding investigation, I found the symptom
"difficulty or refusal to have the hair combed" as noted during the
first visit. From them I selected the cards where the symptom had a specific
follow-up during the drug therapy.
No card refers to autistic Down children as
otherwise reported there (Cocchi, 2003).
From these records I collected:
- sex; -
- chromosomal diagnosis; -
- age at 1st consultation;
- length (in months) of the drug therapy
until the symptom disappeared or, if else, until the last checkup.
I processed data with plain statistics
according to sex, chromosomal anomalies and age bands. When fitting, I applied
the ANOVA test.
Results.
Data of the 33 subjects belonging the
selected clinical cards had a summarizing into the following 1-5 tables.
The average age to the first visit resulted
69.70 months, with range 11-204 months.
Unfortunately this symptom, as judged of
poor relevance, had even poor follow-up during the drug therapy.
In 31 Ss out of 33, this symptom
disappeared, and in two, at the end of available checkups - respectively after
25 and 38 months of drug treatment -, this symptom was still present.
Tab. 1. Gender distribution of the symptom
prevalence, the total amount and Ss treated with drugs.
|
Presence of the symptom |
83 |
100.00% |
|
Males |
39 |
46.99 |
|
Females |
44 |
53.01 |
|
M/F ratio |
88.63% |
|
|
Drug treated Ss |
33 |
39.76% |
|
|
||
|
Drug treated Ss |
33 |
100.00% |
|
Males |
14 |
42.42% |
|
Females |
19 |
57.58% |
|
M/F ratio |
73.78% |
|
|
|
||
|
Months of treatment, average |
|
|
|
Total |
10.97 |
|
|
Males |
11.72 |
|
|
Females |
10.42 |
|
How we can see, only in the 33% of the
subjects owning the symptom according to the first visit had a specific
follow-up during drug therapy.
In this sub-sample also there is clear
female prevalence, even more marked. There it does not stand any gender
difference as for the length of the drug therapy till the disappearance of the
symptom, or at the end checkup.
Tab.2. Distribution of chromosomal diagnoses
of the prevalence of the symptom "having difficulty or refusal to have the
hair combed ".
|
Presenzsence of the symptom |
83 |
100.00% |
|
Standard trisomy 21 |
78 |
93.98% |
|
Translocations |
2 |
2.41% |
|
Mosaicisms |
3 |
3.61% |
|
|
||
|
Ss treated by drugs |
33 |
100% |
|
Standard trisomy 21 |
33 |
100% |
The only presence of subjects with trisomy
21, has very high probability of being simply an artifact due to the reduced
total of the sub-sample of drug treated Ss.
Tab. 3: Distribution of the symptom
according to the age, for bands of two years.
|
Years age bands, |
Symptom present / investigated Ssi |
Symptom present / treated Ss |
Ss with the symptom off after drug therapy |
|||
|
Ss nr. |
% |
Ss nr. |
% |
Ss nr. |
% |
|
|
1-2 |
9 |
10.84 |
5 |
15.16 |
4 |
12.12 |
|
3-4 |
28 |
33.74 |
8 |
24.25 |
7 |
21.22 |
|
5-6 |
18 |
21.69 |
6 |
18.18 |
6 |
18.18 |
|
7-8 |
13 |
15.67 |
7 |
21.21 |
7 |
21.21 |
|
9-10 |
5 |
6.02 |
1 |
3.03 |
1 |
3.03 |
|
11-12 |
8 |
9.64 |
4 |
12.12 |
4 |
12.12 |
|
13-14 |
2 |
2.40 |
2 |
6.06 |
2 |
6.06 |
|
Totals |
83 |
100.00 |
33 |
100.00 |
31 |
93.94 |
Investigated vs
treated Ssi: ANOVA: F = 7.91 with 13 df and p = .031.
The distribution of treated Ss is significantly
different from that of the subjects owning the symptom at the first visit. At a
first blink, it occurred like a selection of sub-sample subjects, although
without any intention to do it.
Over 93% had the disappearance of the
symptom during an antistress drug therapy.
Tab. 4: Main used drugs, in mg/die, by the
oral via, if not otherwise specified
|
Drug |
Mg/die, by the oral via |
Ss nr. |
% |
|
Pyridoxine |
75-150 |
33 |
100.00 |
|
Glutamine |
125-250 |
22 + ( 11 ^) |
66.67 |
|
Glutamine + pemoline |
(45+5) -(90+10) |
11 |
33.33 |
|
Diazepam |
1-3 |
25 |
75.76 |
|
Bromazepan |
0.75-1.5 |
5 |
15,15 |
|
Oxazepam (*) |
5-10 |
5 |
15.15 |
|
Delorazepam |
0.2-0.5 |
3 |
9.09 |
|
Thiamine + pyridoxine + cyanocobalamine (**) |
125mg+125mg+250gam-ma |
33 |
100.00 |
|
Metiltetrahydrofolates (***) |
7.5 |
27 |
81.81 |
|
Carbamazepine |
50-100 |
9 |
27.27 |
|
Amantadine (****) |
50-100 |
11 |
33.33 |
|
5-hydroxytriptophan |
25-50 |
9 |
27.27 |
|
S-adenosil-l-methionine |
100-200 |
12 |
36.36 |
^ When the glutamine +
pemoline has been marketed out, it has been substituted with glutamine and
amantadine. (*) In infants, then substituted with another benzodiazepine. (**) The
following substitute of the pyridoxine; (****) Used when the diet doesn't
introduce folates or it was very poor of them. (****) Substitute of the
pemoline in hyperactive Downs.
As for the average, it is about five drugs
for subject.
Tab. 5: Length of the drug therapy, in
months, till disappearance of the symptom (31 subjects).
|
Years age bands |
1-2 |
3-4 |
5-6 |
7-8 |
9-10 |
11-12 |
13-14 |
|
Average length, months |
10.5 |
11.29 |
10.67 |
7.57 |
8* |
6.75 |
9** |
|
Months range |
4-14 |
4-27 |
6-18 |
4-10 |
8* |
3-8 |
8-18** |
* One S; ** Two Ss.
The drug therapy length, according to band
age has not an indicative course, perhaps even for the amount difference of the
components of the various bands of age. As average, within 11.29 and 6.75
months, the parents reported disappearance of the symptom. The range is 3-27
months.
Discussion.
This second investigation, althougn carried
out in a modest sample, brings some new information, with the limits due to
only 33 cases.
The first one comes from the different
distribution of the chromosomal anomalies. Subjects with mosaicisms and
translocations do not have a share in this sample. It is much probable that it
is creditable to the poor numerical consistence of the sample, but this is not
a sure thing, and to the moment I am unable to decide with safety.
Although this symptom affects both sexes, it
has a clear female prevalence, that here comes confirmed and reinforced.
In over 93% of the cases, the difficulty or
the refusal to have the hair is combed is missing following an antistress drug
therapy, not specifically targeted to this symptom. This is a datum that
confirms its relationship with the stress.
The fact that in two children, belonging to
the first two age bands, this symptom was still present after respectively 25
and 38 months of drug therapy, strongly suggests that every individual has own
features of answering to the stress. An antistress drug therapy can only be made
more effective in the long time. Even more the extra chromosome 21 stands in
every cell and it will stay there. (Cocchi, 1993)
In fact in both cases the therapy stopped,
perhaps because the parents not have seen in a hurry the results they hoped, or
perhaps for other reasons (Cocchi, 1987: Cocchi, 2001, Unidown 1985).
Conclusions.
Thirty-three Down subjects who showed the
symptom "difficulty or the refusal to have the hair combed", had
follow-ups of such a symptom during an antistress drug therapy. Thirty-one
(93.94%) had the disappearance of it after, at average, 10.97 months of
treatment. It is confirmed the female prevalence, and, ex adjuvantibus, the
relationship of the symptom with the stress.
References.
Cocchi R. The difficulty of being combed as a curious symptom in Downs. An epidemiological investigation on 510 subjects. August 2003, <www.stress-cocchi.org/Down32.htm> .
Cocchi R. Drug therapy in Down's syndrome:A theoretical context. It. J. Intellect. Impair. 1993, 6: 143-154. <www.stress-cocchi.org/Down14.htm> .
Cocchi R. (Letter of complaint). Sindrome di
Down 1987, 4 / no.7: 26.
Cocchi R. Mitigation of facial features in Downs undergoing drug therapy: 23 years later. 2001<www.stress-cocchi.org/Down22.htm> .
Unidown Scientific Committee (Giorgio
Albertini, neurologo; Massimo Badas, pedagogista; Paolo Berruti, neurologo;
Franco Chiappe, neonatologo, Franca Dagna Bricarelli, genetista; Bruno
Dallapiccola, genetista; Ennio Del Giudice, pediatra; Franca Felicioli,
psicopedagogista; Angiolina Garau, pediatra genetista; Maria Luisa Giovannucci
Uzielli, pediatra genetista; Liliana Minoja Zani, neuropsichiatra infantile;
Aldo Moretti, psicopedagogista; Alberto Rasore Quartino, pediatra genetista;
Vincenzo Reale, pediatra; Valerio Ventruto, genetista): Perche' no alle terapie
farmacologiche nella sindrome di Down. Sindrome di Down 1985, 2 / no. 4, 1-3.
Posted on Internet on september 2003. Copyright by Renato Cocchi 2003.
Author's address: dr Renato Cocchi, via Mercalli 10,
42100 Reggio Emilia (Italy)
renatococchi@libero.it
Modulation of stress answers by drugs.
Down syndrome
Home Page / / / Pagina iniziale