TOILET HABITS IN DOWNS:
A SURVEY ON 492 SUBJECTS.

Renato COCCHI, neurologist and medical psychologist

(Italian translation) 

Summary

The records of an unselected consecutive series of 530 Down Ss, all seen by the author, were examined as for toilet habits, as checked at first consultation. The records of thirty-eight psychotic Downs were discarded because possible interferences of the superimposed psychosis.

The remaning 492 showed their year of birth ranging from 1944 to 1995 and were so distributed: 286 M + 206 F; M/F ratio = 139/100; chromosomal anomalies: pure trisomy 21 = 90.04%; mosaicism = 3.05% , translocations = 3.25%, unknown = 3.66%. The sample was split up into 12 age subsamples from 4-6 months to 181 months and more.

The results shows that normal or nearly normal toilet habits range from about 40% to 80%; average more than 50% have scarce troubles or no one in this respect. Atonic or mainly atonic constipation is the more frequent toilet trouble and could be found from about 7% to about 23%, and averages about 13%. Spastic or mainly spastic constipation has 30% as its main value in the 49-60 age group but is average about 9%.

Many age groups do not have Ss with frequent diarrheas as prevalent toilet habit. Diarrheas could be found in age from 13 to 60 months and in the 109-132 months age group. When present, such a trouble averages about 3.5%.

Lastly, mixed forms average 3%, of which the more frequent is alternation of atonic or spastic constipation, followed by alternation of spastic constipation and diarrheas.

Key words: Down's syndrome; toilet's habits; age; epidemiology; survey.

 

Symptoms

Down's syndrome

Mental retardation

Home Page

 

 The way usually Downs empty their bowels do not seem to have got any interest from researchers. This fact appears singular since often such habits bring recurrent troubles for the subjects themselves and the parents.

Perhaps a poor understanding of the link between these habits and the general well-being is the reason of it. In itself, the way a person evacuates in a moment of its biological cycle can inform us at least about peripheral cholinergic mechanisms. In other terms, atonic and spastic constipation, look as opposite states of intestinal cholinergic functions, with scarce or excess working. The anecdotal reports of the mothers about constipation after antibiotic therapies in their children did not reach the attention they could have deserved.

On the other hand, many of us can hardly claim the so-called damage of the intestinal flora balance after antibiotics, for the cause when the exit is not diarrhea.

While in general we can accept these premises, yet these habits i n Down Ss would have had more attention. Like in all other MR people, these persons show increased troubles in many vegetative processes.

Having nearly always asked for information about evacuating habits in Downs since their first consultation, I thought I collected a large amount of data on it.

Subjects and method.

I checked the reports of 530 Down syndrome subjects I saw at first consultation from January 1979 to April 1966. From these I did not look at reports of psychotic Down subjects, having thought the dual diagnosis could be a relevant variable.

From each report I collected sex, the year of birth, the age at first consultation, chromosomal anomaly and toilet habits.

Only when I reported these habits in first consultation's records, they fitted for this survey. Having treated these subjects by drugs, following checkups, usually three months later, could yet have varied them as for this symptom.

The records report the prevalent symptom alone (normality, atonic constipation, spastic constipation or diarrheas) or in mixed forms.

Atonic constipation means not daily evacuation with hard and large faeces. Spastic constipation means not daily evacuation with faeces in small bolls, like goats do.

Mixed forms vary from mixed with a prevalent habit to nearly same presence of two or more habits.

After a total processing of the data, the same were singled out according to age at first consultation, from 4-6 months to 181-510 months.

Graphics shows rate distributions by age of the prevalent forms or true mixed forms.

Data were only processed in plain statistics.

Results.

Only 492 reports out of 530 fitted the criteria of this survey. The data were summarized in Table 1-14 and in Graphics 1-5.

Table 1, shows the epidemiological data of the sample.

 

Tab. 1: epidemiological data of the sample.

No. of Ss

492

100.00%

of them M

286

58.13%

F

206

41.87%

M/F

139:100

 

Birth year's range

1944-1995

 

Chromosomal anomalies:

 

 

Unknown

18

3.66%

Standard Trisomy 21

443

90.04%

Mosaicisms

15

3.05%

Translocations

16

3.25%

As we can see, the ratio F/M matches both Italian and international gender distribution and the same happens for chromosomal anomalies, though 18 out of 492 are unknown.

 

In Table 2 I reported the evacuating habits of the total sample, as I collected them during first consultations.

Tab. 2 Evacuation habits of the samples, as collected during the first consultation.

Habit

No. of Ss

%

Not collected

82

16.67

Celiachia

1

0.20

Normal

146

29.66

Normal, but dry faeces:

10

2.03

Normal with rare atonic constipation

46

9.35

Normal with rare spastic constipation

36

7.32

Normal, with rare diarrheas

27

5.49

Normal with rare atonic constipation orrare spastic constipation

2

0.41

Normal with rare atonic constipation or rare darrheas

3

0.61

Normal with rare spastic constipation or rare diarrheas

6

1.22

Constipation, atonic

46

9.35

Constipation, atonic or rare diarrheas

5

1.02

Constipation, atonic or spastic

8

1.63

Constipation, atonic or spastic, or rare diarrheas

3

0.61

Constipation, atonic or spastic or diarrheas

1

0.20

Constipation, atonic, rarely spastic or rare diarrheas

2

0.41

Constipation, atonic or rarely spastic

1

0.20

Atonic constipation, or diarrheas

2

0.41

Constipation, spastic

31

6.30

Constipation, spastic or rarely atonic

6

1.22

Constipation, spastic or rare diarrheas

9

1.83

Spastic constipation or diarrheas;

2

0.41

Diarrheas

10

2.03

Totals

492

100.00

 

In 82 cases out of 492 I did not ask for it, I cannot remember why. Probably I forgot asking this habit, although I planned to do it. About 30% of the sample reported absolutely normal evacuating habit at the time of their first consultation.

 A small group of Down babies, aged 4-6 months, had its description in Table 3.

 

Tab. 3: habits of 15 Ss (7 M + 8 F) aged 4-6 months.

Habit

No. of Ss

%

Not collected

2

13.33

Normal

7

46.66

Normal, but dry faeces

1

6,67

Normal with rare spastic constipation

1

6,67

Normal, with rare diarrheas

2

13.33

Normal with rare atonic constipation or rare spastic constipation

1

6.67

Constipation, atonic

1

6.67

Totals

15

100.00

While most of them had normal or quite normal evacuation, we can see a case of atonic constipation.

 

Forty-six babies aged 7-12 months, made the Table 4 up.

Tab. 4: habits of 46 Ss (25 M + 21 F) aged 7-12 months.

Habit

No. of Ss

%

Not collected

7

15.22

Normal

17

36.96

Normal, but dry faeces

1

2.17

Normal with rare atonic constipation

5

10.85

Normal with rare spastic constipation

4

8.70

Normal, with rare diarrheas

3

6.52

Constipation, atonic

3

6.52

Constipation, very atonic

2

4.36

Constipation, atonic or rare diarrheas

1

2.17

Constipation, atonic or spastic

1

2.17

Constipation, atonic or spastic or diarrheas

1

2.17

Constipation, spastic

1

2.17

Totals

46

100.0

 

Atonic or spastic constipation or mixed forms count up 9 babies out of 42, being an actual trouble.

 

Table 5: Habits of 78 Ss ( 44 M + 34 F) aged 13-24 months

Habit

No. of Ss

%

Not collected

10

12.83

Celiachia

1

1.28

Normal

20

25.65

Normal, but dry faeces

2

2.56

Normal with rare atonic constipation

8

10.27

Normal with rare spastic constipation

9

11.54

Normal, with rare diarrheas

6

7.69

Normal with rare atonic constipation or rare spastic constipation

1

1.28

Normal with rare spastic constipation or rare diarrheas

1

1.28

 

 

 

Constipation, atonic or rare diarrheas

2

2.56

Constipation, atonic or spastic

2

2.56

Constipation, atonic or spastic, or rare diarrheas

2

2.56

Constipation, atonic, rarely spastic or rare diarrheas

1

 

1.28

 

Constipation, spastic

3

3.85

Constipation, spastic or rarely atonic

2

2.56

Diarrheas

2

2.56

Totals

78

100.00

 

In Table 5, about the same rate of infants had the same troubles in their evacuating habits, as we found in 7-12 months babies. Diarrheas, as prevalent habit, started to appear in one infant.

 

Tab. 6: Habit of 63 Ss (34 M + 29 F) aged 25-36 months.

Habit

No. of Ss

%

Not collected

12

19.04

Normal

17

26.97

Normal with rare atonic constipation

8

12.70

Normal with rare spastic constipation

5

7.94

Normal with rare spastic constipation or rare diarrheas

 1

 1.59

Constipation, atonic

5

7.94

Constipation, very atonic

1

1.59

Constipation, atonic or rare diarrheas

1

1.59

Constipation, atonic or spastic

1

1.59

Constipation, spastic

7

11.11

Diarrheas

5

7.94

Totals

63

100.00

 

We found evacuating troubles at least in about 1/3 of the 3-years old infants, with the maximum presence of diarrheas, as reported in Table 6. The increase of spastic constipation is to be pointed up, having now the same rate of atonic constipation.

 

Tab. 7: Habits of 35 Ss (21 M + 14 F) aged 37-48 months.

Habit

No. of Ss

%

Not collected

5

14.28

Normal

7

20.00

Normal, but dry faeces

1

2.06

Normal with rare atonic constipation

4

11.43

Normal with rare spastic constipation

2

5.71

Normal, with rare diarrheas

1

2.06

Normal with rare atonic constipation or rare diarrheas

 2

 5.71

Constipation, atonic

7

20.00

Constipation, very atonic

1

2.06

Constipation, spastic

4

11.43

Diarrheas

1

2.06

Totals

35

100.00

 

The 37-48 months' age group in Table 7 looks different, although more than 35% of the children have toilet troubles. There is a decrease both in spastic constipation and in diarrheas.

 

Tab. 8: Habits of 40 Ss (24 M + 16 F) aged 49-60 months

Habit

No. of Ss

%

Not collected

7

17.50

Normal

11

42.50

Normal, but dry faeces

1

2.20

Normal with rare atonic constipation

3

7.50

Normal with rare spastic constipation

3

7.50

Normal with rare spastic constipation or rare diarrheas

 1

 2.50

Atonic constipation, or diarrheas

1

2.50

Constipation, spastic

5

12.50

Constipation, spastic or rarely atonic

2

5.00

Constipation, spastic or rare diarrheas

5

12.50

Spastic constipation or diarrheas

1

2.50

Diarrheas

1

2.50

Totals

40

100.00

 

 Maximum of spastic constipations was the prominent feature of toilet troubles in 49-60-months children, as the Table 8 shows. Thirty percent of this age group complained of them, while the total rate of children with toilet troubles did not vary.

 

Tab. 9: Habits of 52 Ss (34 M + 18 F) aged 61-84 months

Habit

No. of Ss

%

Not collected

7

13.46

Normal

16

30.78

Normal, but dry faeces

2

3.85

Normal with rare atonic constipation

7

13.46

Normal with rare spastic constipation

3

5.77

Normal, with rare diarrheas

5

9.62

Constipation, atonic

4

7.69

Constipation, atonic or spastic

1

1.92

Constipation, atonic or rarely spastic

1

1.92

Constipation, spastic

3

5.77

Constipation, spastic or rarely atonic

1

1.92

Constipation, spastic or rare diarrheas

1

1.92

Spastic constipation or diarrheas

1

1.92

Totals

52

100.00

 

The 61-84 months' age range, as summed up in Table 9, reported a coming back to about 23% of toilet troubles, with same rates of atonic or spastic constipations.

 

Tab. 10: Habits of 38 Ss ( 27 M + 11 F) aged 85-108 months.

Habit

No. of Ss

%

Not collected

7

18.42

Normal

16

42.12

Normal with rare atonic constipation

3

7.89

Normal with rare spastic constipation

1

2.63

Normal, with rare diarrheas

2

5.26

Constipation, atonic

4

10.53

Constipation, very atonic

1

2.63

Constipation, atonic or spastic

2

5.26

Constipation, atonic or spastic, or are diarrheas

1

2.63

Constipation, spastic

1

2.63

Totals

38

100.00

 

 According to data shown in Table 10, children aged 65-108 months do the same rate of total toilet troubles as previous age group did. Atonic constipation comes again at first place.

 

Tab. 11: Habits of 47 Ss (26 M + 21 F) aged 109-132 months

Habit

No. of Ss

%

Not collected

10

21.28

Normal

14

29.78

Normal with rare atonic constipation:

3

6.38

Normal with rare spastic constipation

3

6.38

Normal, with rare diarrheas

5

10.64

Normal with rare spastic constipation or rare diarrheas

 1

2.13

Constipation, atonic

4

8.51

Constipation, atonic or spastic

1

2.13

Constipation, spastic

5

10.64

Diarrheas

1

2.13

Totals

47

100.00

 

 Also the age group of children aged 109-132 months shows the same rate of toilet troubles, as summed up in Table 11. There is a slight prevalence of spastic constipation.

 

 Tab. 12: Habits if 36 Ss (19 M + 17 F) aged 133-156 months

Habit

No. of Ss

%

Not collected

7

19.44

Normal

10

27.77

Normal, but dry faeces

1

2.78

Normal with rare atonic constipation

3

8.33

Normal with rare spastic constipation

4

11.11

Normal, with rare diarrheas

2

5.56

Constipation, atonic

6

16.67

Constipation, very atonic

1

2.78

Constipation, spastic or rare diarrheas

2

5.56

Totals

36

100.00

 

As we can see in Table 12, although the total toilet troubles remain in the same percent rate, atonic constipation highly prevails in the 133-156 months' age group.

 

Tab. 13: Habits of 15 Ss (11 M + 4 F) aged 157-180 months.

Habit

No. of Ss

%

Not collected

4

26.67

Normal

2

13.33

Normal, but dry faeces

1

6.67

Normal with rare atonic constipation

2

13.33

Normal with rare spastic constipation

1

6.67

Normal, with rare diarrheas

2

13.33

Normal with rare spastic constipation or rare diarrheas

1

6.67

Constipation, atonic

2

13.33

Totals

15

100.00

 

In young Downs 13-15 years old toilet troubles had a reduced report, and only in form of atonic constipation, as summed up in Table 13.

 

Tab. 14: Habits of 27 Ss (17 M + 10 F) aged 181-510 months (15;1-43;6 years)

Habit

No. of Ss

%

Not collected

4

14.82

Normal

9

33.34

Normal with rare atonic constipation or rare diarrheas

1

 3.70

Normal, rare spastic constipation or rare diarrheas

1

 3.70

Constipation, atonic

4

14.82

Constipation, very atonic

1

3.70

Constipation, atonic or rare diarrheas

1

3.70

Constipation, atonic or spastic, or rare diarrheas

1

 3.70

Atonic constipation, or diarrheas

1

3.70

Constipation, spastic

2

7.42

Constipation, spastic or rarely atonic

1

3.70

Constipation, spastic or rare diarrheas

1

3.70

Totals

27

100.00

 

Table 14 encompasses a very large age group, with prevalence of subjects referring to toilet troubles, mainly atonic constipation.

 

 Graphic 1 shows that normal or nearly normal toilet habits range from about 40% to 80%; average more than 50% have scarce troubles or no one in this respect.

 

 Atonic or mainly atonic constipation is the more frequent toilet trouble and can be found from about 7% to about 23% and averages about 13%, as reported in Graphic 2.

In 49-60 months' age group none referred atonic or mainly atonic constipation, although there are few episodic reports of such a trouble in mixed forms.

 

 Two age groups, 4-6 months and 167-180 months do not present spastic or mainly spastic constipation that has 30% as its main value in the 49-60 age group. This trouble is average about 9%, as in Graphic 3.

 

 
As for Graphic 4, many age groups do not have frequent diarrheas as prevalent toilet habit. This can be found in age from 13 to 60 months and in the 109-132 months age group. When present, such a trouble averages about 3.5%.

 

 Lastly, Graphic 5 shows mixed forms, of which the more frequent is alternate atonic or spastic constipation, followed by alternation of spastic constipation and diarrheas. Mixed forms does not reach 3% average.

Discussion.

This survey presents data on 410 Down subjects out of 492. Although I have intended to check toilet habits in all Downs who went at consultation, I forgot to do it in about 17% of them.

In spite of all that, the data I collected can start to frame what could usually be neglect as a coarse symptom, not deserving any interest. I think we have to reject this trivial medical conduct, although now toilet habits, except prolonged diarrheas, mainly belong to the field of self-medication.

The literature gives very poor help. I did not found any reference to these symptoms in books of Lambert e Rondal, 1979; CePiM, 1984, Rondal, 1986; Bomey, Echavidre & Patte-Malson, 1985. Nowak, Ghishan & Schulze Delrieu, 1983; Simila & Kekkonen, 1990 wrote about celiac disease. Williams et al., 1985, tested xylose malabsorption, suggesting that this last could play a role in a number of the vitamin and mineral deficits found in people with Down syndrome.

About celiac disease, of which I found only one diagnosed case in this survey, Simila & Kekkonen, 1990 counted it up to 8 per 1000 live-born cases. As these Authors stated, this illness could be kept in mind when checking Downs complaining recurrent diarrheas and/or delayed puberty.

To explain toilet habits in Down we ought to look at many factors, often shared with the same age general population.

We can remind the poor physical activity, the refusal for boiled or raw vegetables and fruit, the need for antibiotic therapies, the so-called psychosomatic reactions. All these factors looks as more pronounced in Downs, at least as usually reported for poor physical activity and a larger use of antibiotics. As for the refusal for vegetables and fruit, as a symptom of stress named hyponeophagia, I checked it both in non treated Downs and in Downs treated with drugs as antistress therapy (Cocchi, 1994 & 1995). The low emotional threshold, a symptom common to all mentally retarded, can get up to more psychosomatic reactions, even intestinal too. It is likely to think that toilet habits reflect also bowel cholinergic functions, with low working in atonic constipation and higher working in spastic constipation and noninfective diarrheas.

Although more than average 50% of our sample do not have evacuation difficulties, this is a poorly understood problem and is worthy of better investigation.

I planned a next survey on toilet habits in drug-treated Down, since drug therapies are mainly antistress therapies.

References

Bomey M.-J., Echavidre P., Patte-Malson L.: Le Mongolisme. Au-delà de la lègende. CTNERHI, Vanves 1986.

Ce.Pi.M: Aspetti epidemiologici, genetici, clinici, riabilitativi e sociali della Sindrome di Down. Ce.Pi:M., Genova, 1984

Cocchi R.: Food habits in Downs of 10 years or more. Ital. J. Intellect. Impair. 1994, 7: 143-154.

Cocchi R.: Food habits in drug treated Downs of 10 years or more. Ital. J. Intellect. Impair. 1995, 8: 147-161.

Lambert J.L., Rondal J.A.: Le Mongolisme. Mardaga, Bruxelles, 1979.

Nowak T. V., Ghishan F.K., Schulze Delrieu K.: Celiac sprue in Down's syndrome. Consideration on a pathogenetic link. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1983, 78: 280-283.

Rondal J.A., Lambert J.L.: Questions et réponses sur le mongolisme. Maloine, Paris 1982.

Smila S., Kekkonen J.: Coexistence of celiac disease and Down syndrome. Am. J. Ment. Retard. 1990, 95: 120-122.

Williams C.A., Quinn H., Wright E.c. et al.: Xylose absorption in Down's syndrome. J. Ment. Defic. Res. 1985, 29: 173-177.

 

First printed on It. J. Intellect. Impair. 1996, 9: 13-25.

 

Author's address : dr Renato COCCHI, via Rabbeno, 3

42100 Reggio Emilia (Italy).

renatococchi@libero.it

 

Italian translation

Symptoms

Down's syndrome

Mental retardation

Home Page