CHILDHOOD PSYCHOSES: RESULTS

ON SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT

OF DOWN AND NON-DOWN SUBJECTS

TREATED BY DRUGS

 

Renato  COCCHI, a neurologist and a medical psychologist

(Traduzione italiana) 

Summary.

 After  3-94  months  of individualized drug therapies, the  results  on  school learning  of 36 psychotic Down children and 29 psychotic non-Down children  were compared.

 The  Down  group  (PDG)  comprised  24  M  and  12  F;  average  age  at  first consultation,  5;10 +  3;1 years; chromosomal diagnoses, 34 pure trisomy  21,  1 mosaicism and 1 not known; DSM-III,R diagnosis, 33 early onset and 3 late  onset Pervasive Developmental Disorder.
 The  non-Down  group  (PNDG)  comprised 16 M and 13 F;  average  age  at  first consultation,  6;1 +  3;1 years; DSM-III,R diagnosis, 20 early onset and 4  late onset  Pervasive Developmental Disorder and 5 Atypical  Pervasive  Developmental Disorders.
 Reading  and writing performance and ability in elementary arithmetic have  all been evaluated. Improvement in classroom behaviour and the increase in  learning capacity are in direct proportion to the duration of drug therapy and follow the same sequence as a normal child on entry to elementary school.

 School  achievement tends to be slower and less frequent in  the  psychotic Down subjects compared to the psychotic non Down group.

 

 Key words: Childhood psychoses; Down children; non-Down children; drug therapy; individualized regimen; school learning; results.

 

 Autism and other psychoses

Down's syndrome

Drug modulation of stress reactions

Home Page  / /  Pagina iniziale

 

    The  possibility  of comparing directly a group of psychotic  Down  children (PDG)  with a group of psychotic non-Down children (PNDG), both tretaed  by  the same child psychiatrist, has already allowed comparisons of notable interest  in epidemilogy and clinical features (Cocchi, 1988), in the area of  self-injurious behaviour  (Cocchi  & Bonaduce, 1988b), in susceptibility  towards  upper  tract respiratory diseases (Cocchi & Bonaduce, 1988a), in global results on  psychotic symptoms  (Cocchi,  1990c) and detailed results on  social  behaviours  (Cocchi, 1991) following drug treatment.

 In  order  to evaluate more precisely the therapeutic benefit obtained  in  the subjects who undervent  drug treatment for at least 3 months, I thought it would be  interesting  to  compare the scholastic achievements of  Down  and  non-Down psychotic   children  whose  parents  had  accepted  this  type  of   treatment, administered along the guidelines already described (Cocchi, 1990b).

  The  two  groups  therefore comprise  only  subjects  assessible  under  these criteria.

 

Materials and method.

 All the clinical records of psychotic Down and non-Down subjects who had been the object of the previous research (Cocchi, 1990c), were re-examined.

 To the psychotic non-Down group were added the records of some new subjects whose progress had been checked after at least 3 months of drug terapy.

 The clinical records selected were those cases where a diagnosis of childhood psychosis conforming to DSM-III,R (1987) had been made during the first consultation. Information regarding classroom behaviour, reading, writing and elementary arithmetic ability was estracted. For each child sex, age at first consultation, chromosomal anomalies (for the Down subjects) were also collected.

 

Results

 Results were reported on tables 1-6.

 According to the diagnoses made during first consultation and the length of drug taking, 2 groups of children records were assembled:

 

1. Psychotic Down children group (PDG):                     36 Ss = 100.00 % .

 

 Characteristics of PDG are:

 Sex:                                  M = 24 and F = 12;  M/F ratio = 200/100.

 Distribution of chromosomal anomalies:

  Pure trisomy 21:                                            34 Ss = 94.44 % ;

  Mosaicisms:                                                  1 "  =  2.78 % ;

  Unknown (only clinical diagnosis):                           1 "  =  2.78 % .

 Average age at 1st consultation:              5;10 years, with SD = 3;2 years.

 Diagnoses, according with DSM-III,R:

  Early onset Pervasive Developmental Disorder:              33 Ss =  91.67 % ;

  Late onset Pervasive Developmental Disorder:                  3 "   =     8.33 % .

 

 Table 1: Results; keys: (=) inadequate or no learning; (+) slight improvement; (++) mild improvement; (+++) marked improvement; (++++) normalized behaviour.

 

S

classroom

behaviour

reading

writing

elementary arithmetic

 

syllabl.

words

Copy

dictatat.

invention

digits sequence

addition

subtraction

Group 1

182

++

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

353

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

Group 2

32

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

34

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

316

++

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

332

+

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

430

++

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

455

++

(pre-elementary school attendance)

Group 3

124

(no attendance to any kind of pre-elementary school, because very young)

   (*)

173

++

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

186

++

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

289

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

325

++

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

330

+

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

333

++

(pre-elementary school attendance)

   (*)

345

+++

++

+

+++

++

+

++

+

+ (*)

400

++

+++

++

++

=

=

=

=

= (*)

433

+++

(attendance on a daily protected workshop)                       

Group 4

93

++

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

101

++

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

120

+

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

191

++

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

225

+

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= (*)

281

++