CHILDHOOD PSYCHOSES: RESULTS
ON SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT
OF DOWN AND NON-DOWN SUBJECTS
TREATED BY DRUGS
Renato COCCHI, a neurologist and a medical
psychologist
Summary.
After
3-94 months of individualized drug therapies, the results
on school learning of 36 psychotic Down children and 29
psychotic non-Down children were
compared.
The
Down group (PDG)
comprised 24 M
and 12 F;
average age at
first consultation, 5;10 + 3;1 years; chromosomal diagnoses, 34 pure
trisomy 21, 1 mosaicism and 1 not known; DSM-III,R
diagnosis, 33 early onset and 3 late
onset Pervasive Developmental Disorder.
The
non-Down group (PNDG)
comprised 16 M and 13 F;
average age at
first consultation, 6;1 + 3;1 years; DSM-III,R diagnosis, 20 early
onset and 4 late onset Pervasive Developmental Disorder and 5
Atypical Pervasive Developmental Disorders.
School
achievement tends to be slower and less frequent in the
psychotic Down subjects compared to the psychotic non Down group.
Key words: Childhood psychoses; Down
children; non-Down children; drug therapy; individualized regimen; school
learning; results.
Autism and other psychoses
Down's syndrome
Drug modulation of stress
reactions
Home Page / / Pagina iniziale
The
possibility of comparing directly
a group of psychotic Down children (PDG) with a group of psychotic non-Down children
(PNDG), both tretaed by the same child psychiatrist, has already
allowed comparisons of notable interest
in epidemilogy and clinical features (Cocchi, 1988), in the area of self-injurious behaviour (Cocchi
& Bonaduce, 1988b), in susceptibility towards
upper tract respiratory diseases
(Cocchi & Bonaduce, 1988a), in global results on psychotic symptoms (Cocchi,
1990c) and detailed results on
social behaviours (Cocchi, 1991) following drug treatment.
In
order to evaluate more precisely
the therapeutic benefit obtained in the subjects who undervent drug treatment for at least 3 months, I
thought it would be interesting to
compare the scholastic achievements of
Down and non-Down psychotic children
whose parents had
accepted this type
of treatment, administered along
the guidelines already described (Cocchi, 1990b).
The
two groups therefore comprise only
subjects assessible under
these criteria.
Materials and method.
All
the clinical records of psychotic Down and non-Down subjects who had been the
object of the previous research (Cocchi, 1990c), were re-examined.
To
the psychotic non-Down group were added the records of some new subjects whose
progress had been checked after at least 3 months of drug terapy.
The
clinical records selected were those cases where a diagnosis of childhood
psychosis conforming to DSM-III,R (1987) had been made during the first
consultation. Information regarding classroom behaviour, reading, writing and
elementary arithmetic ability was estracted. For each child sex, age at first
consultation, chromosomal anomalies (for the Down subjects) were also collected.
Results
Results were reported on tables 1-6.
According to the diagnoses made during first consultation
and the length of drug taking, 2 groups of children records were assembled:
1. Psychotic Down children group
(PDG): 36 Ss = 100.00
% .
Characteristics of PDG are:
Sex: M = 24 and F
= 12; M/F ratio = 200/100.
Distribution of chromosomal anomalies:
Pure trisomy 21: 34
Ss = 94.44 % ;
Mosaicisms:
1 " = 2.78 % ;
Unknown (only clinical diagnosis): 1 " = 2.78
% .
Average age at 1st consultation: 5;10 years, with SD = 3;2 years.
Diagnoses, according with DSM-III,R:
Early onset Pervasive Developmental
Disorder: 33 Ss = 91.67 % ;
Late onset Pervasive Developmental
Disorder: 3 " =
8.33 % .
Table 1: Results; keys: (=)
inadequate or no learning; (+) slight improvement; (++) mild improvement; (+++)
marked improvement; (++++) normalized behaviour.
|
S |
classroom behaviour |
reading |
writing |
elementary arithmetic |
|||||
|
|
syllabl. |
words |
Copy |
dictatat. |
invention |
digits sequence |
addition |
subtraction |
|
|
Group 1 |
|||||||||
|
182 |
++ |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
353 |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
Group 2 |
|||||||||
|
32 |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
34 |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
316 |
++ |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
332 |
+ |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
430 |
++ |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
|
455 |
++ |
(pre-elementary school attendance) |
|||||||
|
Group 3 |
|||||||||
|
124 |
(no attendance to any kind of
pre-elementary school, because very young) |
(*) |
|||||||
|
173 |
++ |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
186 |
++ |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
289 |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
325 |
++ |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
330 |
+ |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
333 |
++ |
(pre-elementary school attendance) |
(*) |
||||||
|
345 |
+++ |
++ |
+ |
+++ |
++ |
+ |
++ |
+ |
+ (*) |
|
400 |
++ |
+++ |
++ |
++ |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
433 |
+++ |
(attendance on a daily protected
workshop) |
|||||||
|
Group 4 |
|||||||||
|
93 |
++ |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
101 |
++ |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
120 |
+ |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
191 |
++ |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
225 |
+ |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= |
= (*) |
|
281 |
++ |
||||||||