THE FEAR STRANGLING  HIS CHILD IN A MAN OF 27 YEARS AS SYMPTOM OF A PHOBIC-OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE TROUBLE, WITH INTRUSIVE THINKING AND ALTERATIONS OF THE HALF-BRAIN DOMINANCE. RESULTS OF THE ANTIDEPRESSANT AND ANTISTRESS DRUG THERAPY.

Renato COCCHI, a neurologtist and a medical psychologist.

 

Abstract.

In a man of 27 years, it happened the obsessive taught onset of strangling his two-year-old son. This kind of negative thought had reference to troubles of the half-brain dominance, with an emergency of "bad" contents. The need of putting his hands around his son's neck, as for becoming convinced he could avoid going further, it is a compulsive aspect with a rationalized explanation.

Similar cases had their literature, and classification in the DSM-IV as (300.3) within obsessive-compulsive disorders. But this trouble seems to have some autonomy, at least for its content, which it uses only stimuli of an internal genesis. The phobic face is much visible, and it seems nearly exclusively a secondary trait to the feeling of personal extraneousness. It could be a signal of much difficulty in the rational control of the situation.

The extended text reports the positive results after 8 months of antidepressant and antistress  drug therapy.

 

Key Words: Stress-cocchi, disorder, obsessive, compulsive, thought, strangulation, son, infant, fear, depression, stress, half-brain, dominance, inversion, emotions, memory, negative, rationality, control.

 

Italian translation

Symptoms

Drug therapy

Depression and stress

Home Page  / / /  Pagina iniziale

 

The fear of killing a son is a not infrequently psychopathologic condition and sometime it had a punctual description as so. In past, when phobic aspects prevailed, it took place within the phobic-obsessive troubles. Now, when instead obsessive-compulsive aspects prevail, it is classified as obsessive-compulsive disturbs. (See: DSM-IV, 300.3, where the idea to attack a child has its room among "aggressive or terrifying impulses").

  It is probable that our subdivisions are always inaccurate and only the fruit of a classification need, while instead we might have a continuum. I shall describe here a case where are phobic, obsessive and even compulsive symptoms. Moreover, as for me, there were some signs of troubled half-brain dominance, which, perhaps, was the starting point of the whole morbid frame (Cocchi, 1994).

 

The case history.

A young man 27 years old, married, with a son of two years. He ended the junior high school and he currently works in the housebuilding.

Second ten days of December 2006: He came to consultation enough upset and terrified. He fears of strangling his son, is afraid of dying, has some suicide ideas, and fears of becoming crazy.

As for his son, to the father occurs the thought to strangle the child. Consequently he needs to put his hands around his son's neck, as for strangulating him, but without touching his skin. He says he does so, to prove to himself that he never would act such an action, since he may maintain his self-control.

He needs frequently to do it to reassure himself. His wife, even attending the consultation, confirms this [compulsive] behaviour, but she inclines to minimize it, probably to avoid her husband to have still more fear. When he gets this bad thought against his son, and the child is not there, he does difficulty to send it away.

This trouble started about two years ago and since over a year he is taking a drug therapy, currently with lorazepam, mirtazapine, sertraline, and pregabalin, without any sensible result. With the same psychiatrist ha runs psychotherapy, once a week, which seem to give him some relief lasting two-three hours, then all returns as first.

Stress symptoms: He has sudden asthenias, for no reason. There is greediness for sweet foods, in particular for the chocolate. Usually, he has normal liking for the meat broth or the cube bouillon, and normal too for milk and dairy. Some days, he wakes up tired, but usually he is feeling better when he is waking up. In the morning, he has an abundant breakfast at once. The warm and the cool let him indifferently. Now, he doesn't bear the noise and the derangement.

 He plays football, and when he plays it too much, then his head clears away. Nighttime bruxism does not occur, neither daily dental shut. There are frequent colic and diarrheas. He has fainting feelings, but not feelings of disbandment. Hands' oversweating is happening. He does not suffer from dyslalia. Fat hair is reported.

Trouble of the half-brain dominance: To the test "Which is the opposite of the colour Red", he answers: Black [a typical depressive answer (Cocchi, 2002; Cocchi, 2004; Cocchi, 2005 )]. He has intrusive thinking, with fluctuating thoughts, mixed with the emergency of negative thoughts. How he said at the beginning of his reported history, it comes the impulse of strangling his son. He is afraid of dying, has some suicide ideas, and fears of becoming crazy.

When he is going to bed, he is happy, because so he stops thinking. At school, he did better mathematics.

Depressive symptoms: He has a depressive face, and tight, with spots but he doesn't cry. To fall asleep, sometimes he needs to have a sexual intercourse with his wife. Tachycardia is present. In past, he had mediastinal oppression, a lump in the throat and air hunger. His willing is scarce. The sexual activity decreased [as a side-effect of the drugs?] To the test "Which is the opposite of the colour Red?" he gives the typical depressive response of Black.

Sleep: At night he is sleeping. He talks when sleeping. At the morning, he doesn't remember what he had dreamt. No nighttime muscular cramps occur as well as drooling in his sleep.

Possible risk factors or antecedents: He had been born from a caesarian section. Now, he does not know if he had symptoms or behaviour signalling a previous brain suffering, in his first year of life. It seems he was a calm child. As a child, he was a little timid, with some difficulty to do friendships.

Other: When he does not work, he feels better.

 Third ten days of January 2007: The first check-up, after 50 days of drug therapy.  He is doing decidedly better, and he has fewer impulses  to strangle his child. He thinks, the lowering is as 50%.

 

Already to the third day of therapy  he  felt a real benefit, being true that he  telephoned his wife, during the work, to say that he did  better. His wife, attending  his check-up too,  says that she was very frightened, because her husband did never phone at home during his work, and first she feared a misfortune.

 

He still fears of dieing, an idea usually instigated him  when he ears to speak about death or corpses.

As previously, he feels better in the mornings and when he doesn't go to work. He says that he is seeking the chocolate as first, but, as for his wife, he eats it of less. Now, he remembers better the dreams, and he gets up always well. The sudden asthenias reduced. The intrusive thinking lowered too, but now it is no more fluctuating, but focussed, mainly on death thoughts. Ideas of suicide were missed.  He not more had feelings of fainting, and the tachycardia is not more shrewd.

 

Poor tolerance rests to the noise and to confusion. At night he continues to speak, even if he feels to sleep better. Colic and the diarrheas  went out and the hand oversweating reduced. He is less lazy. His face is more relaxed with missing nearly at all of the spots. The hairs are still fat. The sexual activity improved and is  more frequent, as reported even by his wife. He resumed playing better to football, as confirmed by his trainer. Now, he has less fear of dieing. In the evening he feels quite tight, even in the muscles.

 

Therapeutic variations (daily dose, by the  oral via): Hanging Bromazepam, it was substituted by Diazepam 2mg; Carbamazepine 200mg.

 

 

First ten days of April 2007, the second check-up. Of facts,  he sustains that he did not improve, but being questioned in a more exact way,  he admits that the episodes are less frequent in comparison with the preceding checkup, even if they have the same intensity.

 

His  wife, who attended the examination, says, as for her, he much improved, a fact  even confirmed by his parents. When however has a critical episode, he forgets totally the gotten improvements, which are as erased, or cannot be recalled. In these moments to  remember him  the days of comfort doesn't serve to anything.

 

 It is as if the situation of discomfort  would eliminate totally the possibility to think the opposite datum. After having discussed  this controversial phenomenon during the examination, eventually he said of being aware that it happened exactly so.

 

 

 First ten days  of July 2007, the third control. He is going much better in comparison with the preceding months. His depression decreased and he has less intrusive thinking.

 

Actually, he is more active and more prone to play with his child, he is more calm and does not speak anymore during the sleep. His diet is now in a more regulated way.

 

 When  he ears  bad news he takes it amiss, but less than in past. By working of less (9 hours per day) he feels better. For this reason, he stopped going to work on Saturday.

 

 His asthenia decreased. He has become more sociable and more participating. Now, he considers himself as 50% improved. Currently, he succeeds to stay with the children. When he ears  bad news, it comes to him to think  for 4-5 days about. His job is running better. Some days he is irritable and reactive. He has gotten greater critical ability [Has he a better control of the left half-brain?] Now it happen he used to smile.

 

Current therapy(daily doses, by the oral via): Carbamazepine 300mg; Pyridoxine 75mg; Glutamine 250mg: Fluoxetine 20mg, 5-hydroxytriptophan 50mg; Amitriptyline 10mg + perphenazine 2mg; diazepam 4mg.

 

Discussion.

As I said in the introduction, the phenomenon is not rare. In my nearly psychiatric practice lasting about 40 years, it seems to me I met, in all, four cases, this inclusive. I must say that the other three were women. The fact that they come always in the same way, is a possible sign of their specificity and, perhaps, of their psychopathological autonomy.

Surely there is a phobic aspect here, but surely also the fear does not concern an external object, as usually it happens. Here it concerns an internal object that gets up from one's own "bad" thinking. Of fact, if not entirely, this phobia is mainly secondary. It ties up to coming out of particular contents of many thoughts. So it occurs even the related fear of doing not succeed to dominate these thoughts or even only to send away them from own mind.

These negative contents of the thought are not continuous, but alternating. So, it seems to have something of similar to switch off (or to switch on) of an interrupter. I ask you your consent about doing this some coarsen simile.

In the reasons that have pushed this young man to ask for a consultation (He fears of strangling his son, is afraid of dying, has some suicide ideas, and fears of becoming crazy") two of them are possible eventualities ( " . . . (he) is afraid of dying, . . . and fears of becoming crazy "). The remaining two ("He fears of strangling his son", . . . has some suicide ideas") implicate a distortion of his real will, which could bring him to act against his current convictions.

The obsessive aspect is give from the unintentional and repeated onset of these "bad" thoughts, recognized as extraneous to his own feeling. This is an upsetting onset because would bring presupposing the coexistence of a double personality. The second one is "inviting" to do to damage, to the little son or to his same.

Already in the attempt of a more suitable comprehension of the "raptus", I wrote (Cocchi, 2003):

"Incomprehensible" murders and raptus find increasing possibilities of explanation if to the usual interpretative lines of the psychology and of the forensic psychiatry is adding the supplies of the neuropsychopathology and of the neurochemistry related to the reactions of stress, of the intrusive thinking, and of the reverse of half-brain dominance, mainly in the emotional structures."

In my preceding article, faced to try an explanation of the "evil" (Cocchi, 2005) I had stated also:

"Given that the evil exists, and that its symbolic interpretation is not the task of this article, I can conclude:

- In condition of temporary prevalence of the opposite half-brain dominance, it may occur the emergency of evil thought, felt as extraneous, against beloved persons;

- About 20% people, who are seeing as half-empty the glass filled to half, had a prevalence of the not dominant half-brain, at least for some functions;

- external or internal stress can elicit troubles of the half-brain dominance, even in persons who previously had a normal half-brain dominance;

- To do evil could find in itself its justification as a reward mechanism as it happens in several computer virus spammers;

- It is not sure that evil and troubles of the half-brain dominance are always correlated. Certainly, they are so in several cases;

- In sects of Satanist type the opposite, which seems to have become an ideological choice, could own opposite half-brain dominance, at least for some functions, to its ground.

To suggest a neuropsychological base in several forms of evil, is only a partial attempt for its better understanding."

In the clinical history of this young man I found symptoms of stress, depressive symptoms and possible symptoms of troubled half-brain dominance, at least for some functions.

The idea of doing damages doesn't however approved, but rejected, even if with some difficulty.

As for this topic, the compulsive aspect shows notable interest. The need to put the hands around the neck of his son, it is only the means to show to himself to have still the control of his will or it is such where this function runs, but there is even something of different. It is not easy to give a sure answer. The will, even when tried, works badly to suppress the negative thoughts.

In facts, the patient seems not to have any choice: He needs to pass through this gesture to have temporarily peace. If the son is not present, and he cannot put in practice this gesture, he may erase the relative intrusive thought with greater work.

In the previous history of this person there is a birth following caesarian section, as a risk factor, and depressive-introvert behaviour in childhood.

Another element to consider, even if by now it I do not know which weigh it could have. It is the fact that he wakes up well and becomes badly during the work. On Saturday and Sunday, days where he does not work, he is less tormented by these "bad thoughts".

 Being lowered the amount of the working stress and elevated  the threshold of tolerance to the stress, the result seems already very positive. It is possible, however, that the  current therapy  is only a substituting therapy and non curative one, if the fall to zero of the brain plasticity, at the pubertal time, corresponds to a true datum.

 

Conclusions.

The obsessive onset of the taught of strangling his two-year-old son in a man of 27 years, has been considered as connected to troubles of the half-brain dominance, with an emergency of "bad" contents. The need of putting his hands around his son's neck, as for becoming convinced he could avoid going further, it is a compulsive aspect with a rationalized explanation.

Similar cases had their literature, and classification in the DSM-IV as 300.3 within obsessive-compulsive disorders. But this trouble seems to have some autonomy, at least for its content, which it uses only stimuli of an internal genesis.

The phobic face is much visible, and it seems nearly exclusively a secondary trait to the feeling of personal extraneousness. It could be a signal of much difficulty in the rational control of the situation.

A better tailored drug intervention and the reduction of the daily and weekly working time,  8 months after  seem  have given both positive results

and  confirmation of the psychopathological hypotheses put forwards.

 

References.

Am. Psychiat. Ass. DSM-IV. Diagnostic and statistical Manualof Mentali Disorders. APA, Washington DC, 1994.

Cocchi R. Defective hemispheric dominance and cognitive behaviour: Speculative onsiderations.<www.reversebrain.net/domin1.htm>

Cocchi R. "Name the opposite of the Red" Test in drug addicts and in normal subjects <www.reversebrain.net/domin5.htm>

Cocchi R. The test "Which is the opposite of the Red colour" in 325 outpatient's subjects <www.reversebrain.net/domin11.htm>

Cocchi R. From the "incomprehensible" murder to the raptus: Mystery or incomplete frame of reference? <www.reversebrain.net/domin15.htm>

Cocchi R. Short-lasting sudden episodes of green colouration of the whole visual field, even persistent six months after a cranial trauma. <www.reveresebrain.net/Case10.htm>

Cocchi R. Evil and the troubles of half-brain dominance: Is there a relationship? <www.reversebrain.net/Domin18.htm>

Posted on internet on 14 March 2007; Copyright by Renato Cocchi, 2007.

 

Author's address: dr Renato COCCHI, via Rabbeno, 3

42100 Reggio Emilia (Italy).

renatococchi@libero.it  

 

Italian translation

Symptoms

Drug therapy

Depression and stress

 Home Page  / / /  Pagina iniziale